Return-Path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157] verified) by mx.softsearch.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.14) with ESMTP id 64274913 for talk@openhack.ru; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:17:58 +0300 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 22so339647fge.24 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:17:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=c4mRkMPDDvlMXz4ZbCwSrFAolpbRowTxhUp2ZZlLI44=; b=jD4bQ/9s0ByFk4nTH1NLPCNVXfY6D9NIsD4Z8AbAdIoUchJZpACXZUeekMv1XdCGIvUXfYemxzMHbaJM94eLJnNQ3WW7yY4UvCY3cOjNRp27n7L8RBJPRdig62YtiXarKLI+0iL2CQFgYGgGdd2VQjzcWXsJ19dFHaIaHrqla4Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=TSXlSoWWbYLfhETy/akWqaIMG1NljVG02xlfckyNCKpQnlvk/NNw4D/nFokDzTezU6zv5hZ1WvjyfhpJDO0xGmn+/yodTaVXrYO4d4D56+nXY0ZCIhdIoLOS8ITLeipD99B3VkPZi2TlqbswWPfoxLiE6qzv/GJ0uGk1dY9E9Ho= Received: by 10.86.4.2 with SMTP id 2mr149578fgd.9.1203697077006; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:17:57 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from moonlight.home ( [80.246.71.156]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 12sm1817264fgg.6.2008.02.22.08.17.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:17:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from moonlight.home (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by moonlight.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8683A7D6; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:17:53 +0300 (MSK) Received: (from tomash@localhost) by moonlight.home (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id m1MGHrEB022439; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:17:53 +0300 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:17:53 +0300 From: Tomash Brechko To: talk@openhack.ru Subject: Re: Reconnections and mod_perl Message-ID: <20080222161753.GA4959@moonlight.home> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 16:09:59 +0100, Kostas Chatzikokolakis wrote: > Good to know. I think it should be more clear in documentation (does > Cache::Memcached work also this way?) cause someone could think he can > use both interchangeably. Yes, C::M::F doesn't hash the prefix for compatibility with C::M. I just pushed to Git the method: $memd->namespace(); $memd->namespace($string); Get and/or set the namespace prefix. Return: scalar, the namespace prefix that was in effect before the call. This doesn't call for a new release however. Instead you may download the latest .tar.gz with 'snapshot' link on http://openhack.ru/Cache-Memcached-Fast Enjoy ;). -- Tomash Brechko